360 Degree Performance Appraisal Pros and Cons

What is a 360-Degree Performance Appraisal?

The 360-Degree feedback phrases procedure is a type of worker assessment procedure that is executed by the employee’s co-workers who work along with him in the same association. The entire procedure is done by gathering reviews and assembled to form a report depending on which the worker is finally assessed.

The main cause for using such a feedback procedure is for the evolution and improvement of the worker. This not only allows the worker to develop but also helps in increasing the productivity of the association.

It is also a good method to assess the workers’ weaknesses and strengths and operate on them.

Some of the exceptional causes why most associations use this 360-degree performance assessment feedback procedure are,

• To satisfactorily assess the worker performance
• To evaluate the development strategy that requires to be executed on the worker
• Can have a neutral review from the workers which help in keeping administrative justice

If you are aware of 360-Degree appraisal advantages and disadvantages, executing the 360-degree performance assessment procedure is a bit difficult. It is mainly useful for long-term growth and the formation of better connections among co-workers.

Goals of 360-Degree Performance Appraisal

The goals of 360-degree performance assessment vary from one association to another. Though its use and execution of it may differ, the main core of this procedure remains the same.

The main goal of this kind of assessment procedure is to study worker performance and deliver better feedback that helps him develop and enhance himself in terms of his job. This is even helpful for the association as enhanced worker performance would help in improving managerial victory.

The best element is that the 360-Degree feedback obtained from other employees would not be partial and impartial towards the worker.

360 Degree Performance Appraisal Process

The 360-degree performance assessment procedure operates well only if it is maintained and executed appropriately. This kind of feedback procedure consumes time, and there would be numerous steps involved in it. The correct order of conducting this feedback procedure would give us beneficial outcomes.

As this 360-degree performance feedback procedure is a progressive form of the assessment procedure, it requires to be implemented in a step-by-step technique.

Some of the things that require to be assessed and obeyed while implementing this feedback procedure are;

1. Choosing the individuals carefully who would be grading
2. Interacting with the individuals who will be included in this procedure
3. Survey allocation is accomplished which is including the queries and notification 
4. Concession of the queries within the time boundary
5. Review obtained should be managed privately
6. The information is organized depending on the review accordingly
7. An action plan is prepared for the worker undergoing evaluation
8. Re-evaluating for considering the progress or result

Pros of 360-Degree Performance Appraisal

1. Makes a medium of open interaction among workers: When an association embraces the 360-degree performance assessment system, the workers working in the association are needed to grade each other’s assignments. Thus, an atmosphere high in open interaction evolves, and workers share the difficulties that are present and offer resolutions to overcome also. This helps the association to crack difficulties that might have developed troubles otherwise.
2. Appreciate a perception of how other workers observe them: In the standard assessment system the perspective is mainly of the administration. Nevertheless, when an association embarks on a 360-degree performance assessment system, the review for a worker comes from numerous levels. A worker can sense how his group members, consumers, and managers observe him and take steps consequently to enhance him.
3. Helps to enhance the worker performance: One of the advantages of using the 360-degree performance assessment system is the review that helps to improve the individual effects of the workers. This is very useful when an association is in the service drive and also wants to continuously enhance the grade of work embarked by each of its workers.
4. The significance of the 360-Degree feedback: Performance assessment always develops an atmosphere of tension for the worker who is being evaluated. But when the 360-degree performance assessment system is utilized appropriately, then the assessment is more like an optimistic review and the worker can take in the r in a more optimistic manner. This would help the worker to comprehend his weaknesses and make an effort to enhance them in the coming future. An enhanced worker would help the association to grow in numerous ways.

Read Also: A Comparison Between Four Types Of Coffees

Cons of 360 Degree Performance Appraisal

1. Very costly: While exploring the 360-degree performance assessment system, it is said that the assessment system is time-consuming. It also boosts the entire workload of the worker. It is said that since the graders have to do their everyday work and also partake in the assessment system, the review from the graders sometimes implies low inspiration and a lowering in satisfaction for the workers. The worker here may also evolve overburdened and might unexpectedly take a conclusion to quit the association in this concern.
2. The participation of the immediate manager is finite: Since the 360-degree performance assessment system includes a review from numerous levels in the association, the immediate manager does not get much included.
3. Sometimes reviews become personal: When an association embarks on a 360-degree assessment method, HR should observe that the review from the graders is productive. The role of the workers should be comprehended when the review is taken from a grader. If a worker does not trade on everyday bases with a consumer or a client, a review from them is not compulsory. If the review is taken, then the review given to the worker would be dishonest and not correct.

Final words

In conclusion, when an association embarks on the 360-degree assessment system, it should keep in mind 360-degree appraisal advantages and disadvantages, and train graders who would evaluate the worker appropriately and help him to grow extensively, both in personal life and areas of the job.

Otherwise, the entire process would be a waste of money and time for the association. It also might de-motivate the worker.